|
2005-2006 Season Results |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Beaver Bonspiel XIV was on February 2, 2008. The 5th Annual MIT Beaver Academic Tournament Open to high school teams across the country. Results of previous tournaments hosted by MIT. Miscellaneous Quizbowl information
The MIT Quiz Bowl team is a subsidiary of the MIT Campus Activities Complex - Academic Competitions Committee. |
Statistics from Previous Seasons BrandeisSeptember 24, 2005MIT A finished fifth in their division with a 3-4 record, including an impressive win over Harvard A, the number one team in their bracket. MIT B finished sixth in their division at 2-5. MIT A went 2-3 in the playoff bracket, while MIT B was 0-5 in the playoffs (including a loss to MIT A). Both records include a final-round forfeit, as the teams had to leave early to catch the commuter rail. Both teams played short-handed, with only three people on each. MIT A
MIT BIndividual stats and game scores are not available for this tournament. Harvard InvitationalOctober 15, 2005The MIT team finished with a 4-6 record.
Points per bonus: 7.92 Beaver Bonspiel XIIOctober 22, 2005
|
| Player | PPG | TU | Neg | TUH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bobby | 30.00 | 3 | 0 | 20 |
| Jean | 26.88 | 24 | 5 | 160 |
| Michael | 20.00 | 7 | 2 | 60 |
| Jason | 19.29 | 14 | 1 | 140 |
| Annelise | 18.33 | 6 | 1 | 60 |
| Jessica | 10.00 | 2 | 0 | 40 |
| Yihsin | 5.00 | 1 | 0 | 40 |
| Rd | Opponent | PF | PA | 10 | -5 | P/B | Players |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brandeis | 90 | 120 | 6 | 2 | 6.67 | Jason 35, Annelise 15 |
| 2 | Harvard A | 45 | 295 | 2 | 1 | 15.00 | Jean 15, Jason 0 |
| 3 | Harvard 1 | 95 | 170 | 5 | 1 | 10.00 | Jean 25, Michael 20, Jason 0 |
| 4 | Tufts | 145 | 30 | 7 | 0 | 10.71 | Jason 40, Michael 20, Jean 10 |
| 5 | NYU A | 165 | 80 | 9 | 3 | 10.00 | Jason 30, Jean 25, Michael 20 |
| 6 | NYU 1 | 75 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3.33 | Bobby 30, Jean 25 |
| 7 | Brown | 110 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 8.33 | Jean 50, Jason 10 |
| 8 | Brown | 55 | 70 | 4 | 1 | 5.00 | Jason 20, Jean 15 |
| 9 | Tufts | 165 | 50 | 9 | 0 | 8.33 | Jean 50, Annelise 20, Jessica 10, Yihsin 10 |
| 10 | NYU 1 | 40 | 125 | 3 | 0 | 3.33 | Annelise 20, Jessica 10, Yihsin 0 |
| T | Total | 985 | 960 | 57 | 9 | 8.07 |
The MIT team finished with a 6-4 record. Both Jean and Annelise finished in the top 10 individuals for the tournament.
| Player | PPG | TU | Neg | TUH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean | 25.50 | 29 | 7 | 200 |
| Annelise | 13.00 | 13 | 0 | 200 |
| Waldo | 2.00 | 3 | 2 | 200 |
| Rd | Opponent | PF | PA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown | 90 | 35 |
| 2 | Harvard | 35 | 390 |
| 3 | Brandeis | 90 | 155 |
| 4 | BU | 130 | 30 |
| 5 | BC | 50 | -5 |
| 6 | Brown | 40 | 20 |
| 7 | Harvard | 10 | 385 |
| 8 | Brandeis | 35 | 90 |
| 9 | BU | 105 | 75 |
| 10 | BC | 105 | 25 |
Points per bonus: 8.11
The MIT team finished with a 1-9 record, and held all opponents under 600 points—a resounding moral victory!
| Player | PPG | TU | Neg | TUH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason | 16.00 | 17 | 2 | 200 |
| Annelise | 20.00 | 20 | 0 | 200 |
| Waldo | 10.00 | 11 | 2 | 200 |
| Rd | Opponent | PF | PA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harvard C | 15 | 575 |
| 2 | Harvard A | 70 | 505 |
| 3 | Yale A | 50 | 410 |
| 4 | Brown | 225 | 120 |
| 5 | BU/Brandeis | 130 | 350 |
| 6 | Harvard B | 180 | 295 |
| 7 | Yale B | 70 | 310 |
| 8 | Williams | 110 | 350 |
| 9 | Yale B | 165 | 310 |
| 10 | BU/Brandeis | 125 | 260 |
Points per bonus: 14.17
The MIT "team" finished with a 2-9 record, another moral victory considering that the two-person team had to wake up at 7:00am, and didn't eat breakfast.
Detailed stats to follow.
| Player | PPG | TU | Neg | TUH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bobby | 220 | |||
| Jason | 220 |
| Rd | Opponent | PF | PA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eric Kwartler | 260 | 120 |
| 2 | Brown | 100 | 90 |
| 3 | Columbia | 130 | 180 |
| 4 | Browndeis | 115 | 130 |
| 5 | Eric Kwartler | 100 | 160 |
| 6 | Columbia | 130 | 325 |
| 7 | Browndeis | 90 | 275 |
| 8 | Eric Kwartler | 135 | 320 |
| 9 | Columbia | 90 | 165 |
| 10 | Browndeis | 90 | 255 |
| 11 | Eric Kwartler | 50 | 145 |
MIT swept the opening round robin for a 7-0 record, earning the top seed in the playoffs. The team finished at 11-1 overall, defeating Dartmouth A in the finals to take first place in the tournament. The team took home fabulous prizes for their performance, including but not limited to the following classic literary works:
There were several special rules in effect for this tournament. Toss-up questions contained two power marks, one for the normal 15 points, and an even earlier one for a "super power" 20 points. The lightning round is a 60-second-long round in which a team answers 10 related questions, earning 5 points for a right answer and losing 5 for a wrong answer. Additionally, each team was allowed to declare one bonus as a "50-or-nothing," earning 50 points if all parts of the bonus were answered correctly, and 0 points otherwise. (This might help to explain some of our unreasonably-high bonus conversion rates.)
Statistics through the round robin (the first 7 rounds):
| Player | PPG | 20 | 15 | 10 | -5 | TUH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annelise | 8.46 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 130 |
| Jason | 17.69 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 130 |
| Jean | 42.14 | 0 | 4 | 25 | 3 | 140 |
| Mark | 44.29 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 140 |
| Michael | 20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 20 |
| Rd | Opponent | PF | PA | 20 | 15 | 10 | -5 | LR | P/B | Players |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BC | 415 | 45 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 40 | 15.36 | Jean 90, Mark 45, Jason 15, Annelise 10 |
| 2 | Brown | 385 | 130 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 25 | 20.00 | Jean 60, Mark 30, Annelise 20, Jason 10 |
| 3 | Rutgers | 280 | 185 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 25 | 18.33 | Mark 40, Jason 25, Jean 25, Annelise 0 |
| 4 | Amherst | 305 | 230 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 45 | 20.56 | Mark 80, Annelise 10, Jean 5, Jason 0 |
| 5 | Olin | 290 | 80 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 40 | 25.00 | Mark 45, Jean 35, Jason 0, Annelise -5 |
| 6 | Dartmouth B | 380 | 75 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 10 | 13.67 | Jean 50, Jason 45, Mark 40, Michael 20, Annelise 10 |
| 7 | Dartmouth A | 370 | 345 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 50 | 25.56 | Jean 30, Mark 30, Jason 20, Annelise 10 |
| 8 | Dartmouth B | 235 | 130 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 35 | 10.00 | Mark 50, Jean 25, Jason 20, Michael 10, Annelise -5 |
| 9 | Dartmouth A | 255 | 290 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 40 | 17.50 | Mark 25, Jean 25, Annelise 20, Michael 5 |
| 10 | Brown | 340 | 245 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 20 | 28.12 | Mark 45, Jean 40, Annelise 10, Michael 0 |
| T | Total | 3255 | 1755 | 3 | 14 | 84 | 9 | 330 | 18.42 |
Special statistics for this tournament: 20 = super power; LR = lightning round (out of a possible 50 points)